Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

WIP: 8206449: ObjectBinding could clear internal value when invalidated #110

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tomsontom
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tomsontom tomsontom changed the title null value field upon invalidation ObjectBinding could clear internal value when invalidated Jun 15, 2018
@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Collaborator

Please file an issue (ideally with a test case) with a description of the problem in JBS if this is something you want to have reviewed for inclusion.

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth added the WIP Work In Progress label Jun 15, 2018
@eugener eugener added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 20, 2018
@tomsontom
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kevinrushforth kevinrushforth changed the title ObjectBinding could clear internal value when invalidated WIP: 8206449: ObjectBinding could clear internal value when invalidated Oct 1, 2019
@kevinrushforth
Copy link
Collaborator

kevinrushforth commented Oct 1, 2019

As announced in this message, the official jfx repository is moving from hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt to github.com/openjdk/jfx.

This sandbox repository is being retired on 1-Oct-2019. You will need to migrate your WIP pull request to the openjdk/jfx repo if you want to continue working on it. Here are instructions for migrating your pull request. The updated CONTRIBUTING.md doc has additional information on how to proceed.

Once you have done this, it would be helpful to add a comment with a pointer to the new PR.


The new openjdk/jfx repo will be open for pull requests on Wednesday, 2-Oct-2019. I will send email to the openjfx-dev mailing list announcing this.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working WIP Work In Progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants